double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs vietnamese seafood double-skinned crabs mud crab exporter double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs crabs crab exporter soft shell crab crab meat crab roe mud crab sea crab vietnamese crabs seafood food vietnamese sea food double-skinned crab double-skinned crab soft-shell crabs meat crabs roe crabs
Opinion

SENATE’S SUMMER SOLDIERS

NATIONAL Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley visited Capitol Hill just before Congress adjourned for July 4. Meetings with a half-dozen senior GOP senators were clearly intended to extinguish fires set by Sen. Richard Lugar’s unexpected break from President Bush’s Iraq policy. They failed.

Hadley called his expedition a “scouting trip,” leading one senator to ask what he was seeking. It wasn’t advice on how to escape from Iraq. Instead, Hadley appeared interested in how previous supporters had drifted from Bush’s course. In the process, he planted seeds of concern. Some senators were left with the impression that the White House still doesn’t recognize the scope of the Iraq dilemma. Worse yet, they see the president running out the clock until April, when a depleted U.S. military will be blamed for the fiasco.

The tone set by Hadley signaled the White House did not understand that Lugar, in his fateful Senate speech the night of June 25, was sending a distress signal to Bush that a change in policy can be instituted only by the president and that it is imperative that he act now. Hadley was told it isn’t too late to go back to last December’s Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group’s neglected 79 recommendations. But the White House still seems unaware of the building tide, typified by the defection last Thursday of six-term Republican Sen. Pete Domenici.

The White House no more expected Domenici to jump overboard than it did Lugar. The shock of Lugar was the reason Hadley quickly scheduled sessions with senior Republican senators such as Lugar and Chuck Hagel, the top two GOP members on the Foreign Relations Committee, and John Warner, former Armed Services chairman.

Hadley took copious notes. But he did more than listen. Based on what Hadley said, one senator concluded “they just do not recognize the depth of the difficulty they are in.” That difficulty entails running out of troops in nine months. Hadley increased fears of the U.S. military being made the fall guy – a concern shared by many retired and some active senior officers.

During his scouting expedition, Hadley was asked why Bush named a serving Army officer – Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute – as a deputy national-security adviser and “czar” of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Isn’t that Hadley’s job? Freshman Democratic Sen. Jim Webb, a lawmaker who has worn the nation’s uniform in combat, was one of four senators who voted against Lute’s confirmation. He told the Senate that Lute’s return to the Army after serving in the administration would threaten the military’s status as a “non-political organization.”

While Lugar’s defection dispatched the national-security adviser to the Hill, Bush did not call the respected senator into the White House for a face-to-face talk. That’s not this president’s style, as shown by his reaction to a July 2 essay by Hagel in the Financial Times calling for an international mediator in Iraq under United Nations Security Council auspices. Hagel had submitted that proposal in a private letter to Bush several weeks earlier. Instead of the president responding to an overture from a longtime critic, Hagel was answered routinely by a third-level bureaucrat.

The first in a succession of critical Republican senators, Hagel feared the worst when he returned home to conservative Nebraska for Fourth of July parades. Instead, he was pleasantly surprised by cheers and calls for the troops to come home. Perhaps a White House scouting trip into the American heartland might be worthwhile.