EyeQ Tech review EyeQ Tech EyeQ Tech tuyển dụng review công ty eyeq tech eyeq tech giờ ra sao EyeQ Tech review EyeQ Tech EyeQ Tech tuyển dụng seafood export seafood export seafood export seafood export seafood export seafood export seafood food soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crab soft-shell crabs soft-shell crabs soft-shell crabs soft-shell crabs soft-shell crabs double skinned crabs
Sports

COURTROOM CIRCUS ON DECK FOR BONDS

SAN FRANCISCO – On Dec. 4, 2003, Barry Bonds walked into a grand jury room on the 17th floor of the Philip Burton Federal Building here and gave three hours of testimony about his alleged steroid use.

Today, he returns to the building as the government begins its case to prove he committed perjury.

Bonds will appear this morning in front of U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James and then U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in Courtroom 10, two floors above where he gave his original testimony.

Bonds, who faces four counts of perjury and one count for obstruction of justice, will be arraigned before James and then have a trial date set by Illston. The proceedings are expected to be short.

Bonds is expected to enter a not-guilty plea, then hear when U.S. vs. Bonds really gets started.

The scene inside will be limited to a small group of credentialed media members and citizens who line up early this morning to get one of the 30 seats available to the public. There will be no cameras inside the federal building, and Bonds’ attorneys probably will do their best to keep Bonds from being seen entering the building.

How Bonds’ attorneys handle today could be the biggest story of the hearings. Bonds’ attorney, Michael Rains, blasted the prosecutors after the indictment was handed down last month. If he backs off accusations that the government has conspired against his client, it may be a sign he’s ready to reach détente with the prosecutors.

“One thing to watch is, are they still going to take this very aggressive, adversarial tone about the prosecution that it is evil and it’s a big plot against Bonds?” said Peter Keane, a law professor at Golden Gate University who has followed the case closely. “That’s what they’ve been saying up until now.

“If you see a more moderate tone taken by Bonds’ lawyers, that’s a tip-off that they want to talk to the prosecution and explore some things, possibly a plea bargain.”

Bonds and Rains had been interviewing attorneys to lead his defense, and late last night, the San Jose Mercury News reported Bonds had added attorneys Cristina Arguedas and Allen Ruby to his legal team. Unlike Rains, the two new attorneys have extensive federal experience. Neither could be reached for comment late last night.

Bonds and Rains had talked with well-known attorney John Keker last week but the two sides disagreed over fees and how much power Keker would have in decisions, a source said. The source said Bonds also talked with George Walker, a respected Bay Area attorney.

Illston will consider the defense’s desires when making the trial date. Because the 43-year-old slugger still wants to play baseball, that may lead him to want a quick trial date.

The Associated Press

contributed to this report.

[email protected]