double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs vietnamese seafood double-skinned crabs mud crab exporter double-skinned crabs double-skinned crabs crabs crab exporter soft shell crab crab meat crab roe mud crab sea crab vietnamese crabs seafood food vietnamese sea food double-skinned crab double-skinned crab soft-shell crabs meat crabs roe crabs
Metro

Schneiderman no fan of antiterror bills

Eric Schneiderman, the Democratic candidate for state attorney general, voted three times as a state senator against antiterrorism bills banning the possession of biological or chemical weapons, The Post’s learned.

Terrorism has reemerged as an issue after a Yemeni-based plot to send parcel bombs on US-bound planes was uncovered Friday.

A little more than a month after 9/11, Schneiderman was one of only three state senators to oppose a bipartisan bill to make possession of biological or chemical weapons a crime. He sided with the New York Civil Liberties Union, which argued that antiterrorism policy should be set at the federal level.

DISPATCHES FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

He also voted no on Feb. 11, 2003, to criminalizing the possession of chemical weapons. That bill passed, 52-8. And when it was debated in ’04, he repeated his no vote. It passed, 51-10, on March 16, 2004.

He called the bills “fundamentally flawed” but voted for a chemical-weapon provision on July 21, 2004, as part of a broader law creating the state Office of Homeland Security.

A spokesperson defended Schneiderman’s voting pattern.

“Eric voted for this bill when it became law in 2004, along with dozens of other antiterrorism bills,” Jamie McShane said. “In terms of the earlier bill, the senator felt that chemical and biological weapons were not strictly enough defined.”

[email protected]