Appeals court rejects SEC fee rule in win for private equity, hedge fund industry
A US appeals court threw out a Securities and Exchange Commission rule intended to give investors more transparency into private funds, handing a victory to the nearly $27 trillion industry.
In a 3-0 decision on Wednesday, the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of six private equity and hedge fund groups, finding the SEC exceeded its authority by adopting the rule in August.
An SEC spokeswoman said the regulator is reviewing the decision and will determine its next steps.
Industry officials praised the decision, saying the SEC rule was unduly burdensome and costly, and threatened to fundamentally change how they did business.
“The ruling is a victory for thousands of businesses across America that need capital to grow and millions of workers who depend on private equity and credit to strengthen their retirements,” said Drew Maloney, chief executive of the American Investment Council, one of the six groups.
Investor advocates criticized the decision, with Stephen Hall, legal director of the nonprofit Better Markets, calling it a “terrible setback.”
He said the decision deprives ordinary Americans with pension funds of protections from unfair and opaque practices, and weakens the SEC’s ability to protect investors, financial stability and market integrity.
The 5th Circuit has become a favored court for conservative and business groups to challenge federal regulatory powers.
The decision is a fresh blow for the SEC and Chair Gary Gensler, as industry groups turn often to conservative-leaning courts to challenge rules they say carry needless red tape and compliance costs, and amount to SEC overreach.
Some hedge fund groups are also suing the SEC over short-selling disclosure rules and changes to their trading practices in US Treasuries, while business groups sued the SEC over climate change rules.
‘Nothing to do’ with private funds
The rule overturned on Wednesday required fund managers to issue quarterly performance and fee reports, perform annual audits, and stop giving some investors preferential treatment over redemptions and special access to portfolio holdings.
It applied to private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and managers of funds for institutional investors such as pension funds and endowments, among others.
Such funds typically attract well-heeled, sophisticated investors, and as a result have received less federal regulatory oversight than investments geared toward ordinary investors.
The SEC said the rule aimed to increase transparency, fairness and accountability in an industry known for opacity.
But opponents said it would ultimately hurt ordinary investors who frequently have indirect exposure to private funds through pension and retirement plans.
Circuit Judge Kurt Engelhardt rejected the SEC’s argument that Congress gave it authority through the 2010 Dodd-Frank law to implement the rule.
He said the applicable provision “has nothing to do with private funds.”
Private funds’ assets under management swelled to $26.6 trillion in 2022 from $9.8 trillion a decade earlier, as the number of private funds more than tripled to about 101,000, according to the SEC.